![hell architect tips hell architect tips](https://fastly.4sqi.net/img/general/600x600/2bIUZx-7brNukOArADpqwaRvxwpvSw9il4-mfmU_WtA.jpg)
The thing that really is alarming is that there kind of is no grand vision. So there is a kind of an explicit anti-intellectualism or more like expertise-eschewing involved here.ĭefector: Yeah, if you read his interviews, the thing that stands out is not so much that he’s driven by this bone-deep commitment to the way things should be, or that he has this like grand vision. Charlie Munger has proudly proclaimed he’s never opened an architecture book. It’s always like, “What the fuck are they doing over there?” But we’re trained in building buildings that, you know, don’t feel horrible to live inside of. This is just like an editorial note, but it feels like every single time that architecture surfaces, in any kind of broader public discourse, we look like such idiots. Ian Miley: I mean, that’s part of the interview I took the least issue with. As a practitioner of the architectural arts, how do you feel about that? The following conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and length.ĭefector: Charlie Munger has given all these interviews where he called architects idiots and fools. Miley is a lecturer and design critic at a handful of universities in Boston, and he is from Santa Barbara and has experience with UC housing, so he seemed like the perfect person to chat with. I wanted to get an informed perspective, so I called up Ian Miley, the smartest architect I know.
![hell architect tips hell architect tips](https://gaminglyfe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Hell-Architect-PC.jpg)
don’t let a fake architect build punishing housing because he has billions of dollars. Munger is a flamboyant character, and his entry into the California housing wars has inspired a good deal of spirited debate- carceral-ass housing is better than no housingvs. McFadden called the proposal “unsupportable from my perspective as an architect, a parent, and a human being” and characterized it as “a social and psychological experiment with an unknown impact on the lives and personal development of the undergraduates the university serves.” Munger returned fire, calling his critics “idiots,” claiming his building would “last as long as the pyramids,” and claimed that windowless living will be “endurable.” UCSB, like most of its fellow UC schools, has both a housing shortage and an increasing dependency on big-money donors, so they are pushing forward with the project despite intense and widespread criticism (the New Yorker‘s architecture critic called it “a jail masquerading as a dormitory.”) Munger is an avowed proponent of designing dorm rooms that are deliberately unpleasant, theoretically forcing students into common spaces where they can collaborate. So why did McFadden take his knives out for Munger? Well, because the vast, vast majority of rooms don’t have windows. The building was designed and partially financed by Charlie Munger, the 97-year-old half-blind billionaire Berkshire Hathaway deputy whose complete lack of architectural education has not stopped him from using his big pile of money to cosplay as a building designer, usually for colleges, which have a long-established relationship with and reliance on megalomaniacal donors.
![hell architect tips hell architect tips](https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/tower-of-hell/images/5/5a/Inversion.png)
![hell architect tips hell architect tips](https://torrent-mass.ru/uploads/posts/2019-07/1562220971_4.jpg)
He did so because UCSB is planning to move ahead with the construction of a monstrous new dorm building, an 11-story cube that will house 4,500 students. In late October, the Santa Barbara Independent blew open a tasty bit of local drama when they reported that long-tenured UCSB Design Review Committee consulting architect Dennis McFadden quit the committee in protest and left an excoriating resignation letter on his way out.